期刊名称:Washington University Global Studies Law Review
印刷版ISSN:1546-6981
出版年度:2002
卷号:1
期号:1
页码:415-449
出版社:Washington University School of Law
摘要:This Article compares four jurisdictional approaches to anticompetitive behavior: (1) the U.S. “rule of reason” approach, (2) the multifaceted flexible approach under the Treaty Establishing the European Community, (3) the relatively strict Australian per se illegality approach, and (4) the less-developed antimonopoly regime in Japan.
关键词:United States; European Union; Australia; Japan; International trade; Rule of reason; Treaty Establishing the European Union; Per se illegality; Antitrust law