期刊名称:BRE : Brazilian Review of Econometrics / Sociedade Brasileira de Econometria
印刷版ISSN:0101-7012
出版年度:2005
卷号:25
期号:1
页码:43-66
出版社:Rio de Janeiro
摘要:The important issue of forecasting volatilities brings the difficult task of back-testing
the forecasting performance. As volatility cannot be observed directly, one has to use
an observable proxy for volatility or a utility function to assess the prediction quality.
This kind of procedure can easily lead to poor assessment. The goal of this paper is
to compare different volatility models and different performance measures using White’s
Reality Check. The Reality Check consists of a non-parametric test that checks if any
of a number of concurrent methods yields forecasts significantly better than a given
benchmark method. For this purpose, a Monte Carlo simulation is carried out with
four different processes, one of them a Gaussian white noise and the others following
GARCH specifications. Two benchmark methods are used: the naive (predicting the
out-of-sample volatility by in-sample variance) and the Riskmetrics method