摘要:Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mengetahui apakah terdapat perbedaan rata-rata kemampuan penalaran matematis yang signifikan antara peserta didik yang menerima pelajaran menggunakan model SAVI dengan pendekatan saintifik,VAK dengan pendekatan saintifik,dan Direct Instruction,serta untuk mengetahui apakah rata-rata kemampuan penalaran matematis peserta didik yang menerima pembelajaran menggunakan model SAVI dengan pendekatan saintifik lebih dari ratarata kemampuan penalaran matematis peserta didik yang menerima pembelajaran menggunakan model VAK dengan pendekatan saintifik dan model Direct Instruction. Pengambilan sampel menggunakan teknik cluster random sampling. Data diperoleh melalui metode tes dan diuji dengan uji normalitas dengan uji Kolmogorov-Smirnov,uji homogenitas dengan uji Levene Test,uji One Way Anova dan uji lanjut Scheffe. Simpulan dari penelitian ini adalah terdapat perbedaan rata-rata kemampuan penalaran matematis yang signifikan antara peserta didik yang menerima pelajaran menggunakan model SAVI dengan pendekatan saintifik,VAK dengan pendekatan saintifik,dan Direct Instruction,serta rata-rata kemampuan penalaran matematis peserta didik yang memperoleh pembelajaran menggunakan model SAVI dengan pendekatan saintifik lebih dari rata-rata kemampuan penalaran matematis peserta didik yang memperoleh pembelajaran menggunakan model VAK dengan pendekatan saintifik dan pembelajaran model Direct Instruction.
其他摘要:The purpose of this study was to determine whether there are differences in average significant mathematical reasoning ability among learners who received lessons using SAVI models with scientific approach,VAK with scientific approach,and Direct Instruction,as well as to determine whether the average mathematical reasoning ability of learners who received lessons using SAVI models with scientific approach was more than average mathematical reasoning abilities of learners who received VAK models with scientific approach and Direct Instruction models. The sample of this program was taking by cluster random sampling. Data collection was performed by testing method. The data analyzing of students mathematical reasoning ability include test for normality using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test,Homogenity test with One Way Anova test,and Sceffe test. The conclusions obtained was there are differences in average significant mathematical reasoning ability among the students who received lessons using SAVI models with scientific approach,VAK with scientific approach,and Direct Instruction,as well as the average mathematical reasoning ability of learners who received lessons using SAVI models with scientific approach was more than average mathematical reasoning abilities of learners who received VAK models with scientific approach and Direct Instruction models.