期刊名称:Celt: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching & Literature
印刷版ISSN:1412-3320
电子版ISSN:2502-4914
出版年度:2016
卷号:16
期号:1
页码:49-66
DOI:10.24167/celt.v16i1.565
语种:English
出版社:Soegijapranata Catholic University
摘要:One significant difference characterizing the 2013 Curriculum from the former ones is the use of alternative assessment to measure the students’ expected learning outcomes. The old-fashioned modes of assessments, such as multiple choice exams, or completion exams are regarded insufficient to capture the language skills of the students. Students' demonstration of the mastery of various domains of learning objectives has not necessarily equated with a demonstration of their capacities in real-world settings. Ideally, what is tested should mirror what really is required outside the classroom. So far, reading mastery is always tested through traditional mode of assessment like multiple choice (MC). The new curriculum recommends a different perspective of assessment which is called alternative assessment. However, the shift from the traditional assessments to alternative assessments seems to aquire some constraints on the parts of the teachers. Many teachers are not familiar with the new concepts and practices within the emerging paradigm. It is due to the absence of a clear guideline for doing such assessments. The goal of this paper is to propose a theoretically grounded method to conduct alternative assessments which are developed from a pair of competence standards listed in the English syllabus for Senior High Schools.
其他摘要:Abstrak: Salah satu yang membedakan kurikulum 2013 dengan kurikulum sebelumnya adalah adanya penggunaan penilaianotentik untuk mengukur hasil belajar siswa. Jenis penilaian lama seperti tes pilihan ganda, atau tes melengkapi dianggap kurang mampu menun
关键词:alternative assessment; reading; English learning
其他关键词:penilaian alternatif; membaca; pembelajaran bahasa Inggris