Gandhian Philosophy and Literature: A Citation Study of Gandhi Marg.
Singh, Shiv ; Rana, Madan Singh
Gandhian Philosophy and Literature: A Citation Study of Gandhi Marg.
1 Introduction
Scholarly communication is remarkably essential for the
understanding of the genesis and progress of disciplines. There are
various statistical tools used to explore the databases in library
science. Among these, bibliometric have been developed as a tool for
measuring and monitoring scientific output (Pritchard (1969), Nicholas
et al. (1978)). The statistical models of scholarly communication flow
can be established by bibliometric techniques using reference made to
other documents i.e. citation analysis. Counting citations is often
called "citation analysis". Information about the
article's impact on its discipline can be gained by counting the
number of times that article has been cited. If an article has a high
number of citations, then one can conclude that it has been the subject
of discussion or criticism in its discipline. Thus, citation analysis is
used to develop relationships between scholarly communications like
documents, journals etc. Further it also can be used to identify the
flow of topics within and among disciplines (Garfield (1955, 1978,
1979)). There have been numerous study conducted on citation analysis of
various single and multiple journals in different fields (Sandison
(1989), Clark (2009), Rana (2010), Singh (2013)).
2 Scope
Gandhian Literature for decades was matter of discussion for
Gandhi's impact on varied disciplines and nowadays, it has is
emerged as a full- fledged new discipline. Looking into this emerging
trend and increased publication activity on this subject, the present
work is related to citation analysis of the one of the most popular and
the oldest journal "Gandhi Marg".
3 Objectives
The prime objectives of this study are to find out the different
characteristics of citations in the source journal under consideration,
in terms of:
a) The year wise distribution of citations, the rate of citations
per article, and the use pattern of different type of documents cited.
b) The core books and journals and the classic publications in the
field.
c) The citing 'half-life' of the literature in the field.
d) The authorship pattern of citations, and highly ranked/core
authors in the field.
4 Methodology
In the present study, the journal Gandhi Marg is considered for
citation analysis. It was started in 1957 and, it has been publishing
Quarterly by Gandhi Peace Foundation, New Delhi. Every issue of the
journal has been examined for the period of 1994 to 2013 and all
necessary information related to citations is arranged in the form of
database specifically designed for citations analysis.
5 Results and Discussion
5.1 Citation Availability in the Journal of "Gandhi Marg"
In order to carry out citation analysis the citations were
collected from the papers of the journal Gandhi Marg, for 20 years i.e.
during 1994-2013. The database for analysis has been planned on the
basis of all essential information associated with citations. The
outcome of this came out to 507 articles. Of 507 articles, 56 articles
were found without citations or references. So, the remaining 451
articles contributed to 9612 citations after removing duplicate citation
(selecting one citation from similar citation(s) repeating in the
article) (Table 1).
Table 1 Availability of Citations in the Journal "Gandhi Marg"
during 1994-2013
No. of article with No. of articles Total no. of Total no. of
citations without citations articles citations
451 56 507 9612
5.2 Year wise Distribution of Citations
The source journal contained 507 articles, comprising of 9612
citations. The highest number of citations in an article was 114,
whereas the lowest number of citations was zero (as 56 articles found
without citations). The details of year wise distribution of citing
articles with corresponding citations and rate of citation per article
in a particular year is illustrated in Table 2 and Figure 1. The
articles published in years 1994 and 2006 were observed to have the
least number of articles i.e. 16. Whereas in year 2009, number of
articles published were maximum i.e. 30. In case of citation, the least
were observed in year 2002 with 319 citations and maximum were 645 in
year 2008. However, it is important to note that the highest value of
average citations per article was 36 for the year 2006 and the lowest
value was 13.29 for year 2002. Further, the overall average citations
per article for the period 1994 to 2013 were 21.31.
5.3 Bibliographical Distribution of Citations
In order to extend the information in the field of any subject
every document has its own importance. For communicating and documenting
the knowledge for future discussion and reference, the various types of
past information channels are being used like books, composite books,
journals, reports, proceedings, letter etc. Table 3 gives the range of
documents along with their citation analysis and shows that the mostly
cited documents are chief sources i.e. books, journals and composite
books. These three documents all together have 73.62 % of the total
citations. It is interested to note here that 4525 citations out of
total 9612 citations were books. It forms about 47.08 % of the total.
This was followed by journals and composite books having 14.11 % and
12.43 % citations respectively. The sources originated by Gandhi like
Harijan, Young India and Harijan Sevak were shown separately as these
were referred frequently. The comparative position of various
bibliographical forms used by the authors during the period is shown in
Table 4. From this table, it is clear that there is no specific trend
because most of the cited forms have same kind of distribution in all
the years. Moreover, the year wise citing trend of top three
bibliographical forms have been presented in Figure 2.
5.4 Chronological Distribution of Citations and Aging of Literature
The characteristic of the cited literature that are studied often
of any discipline is called an age. This study helps to reveal how
rapidly the literature on the any subject becomes obsolete. It is also
useful for the prediction of how far a search must go back for obtaining
a representative sample of the published area. In order to identify the
period from which the literature was frequently used, the comparison of
the chronological distribution of the cited document has been presented.
In the present case, only 9311 citations are taken into account (since
301 citations were found without year) for analysis. The chronological
distribution of citations from year 1687 to 2013 is presented in Table 5
and Figure 3. This period has been distributed into 12 groups, each of
one decade (except the first group having the span of 216 years i.e.
from 1687 to 1903). It is clear that about 20.38 % of the cited
literature i.e. 1959 citations, irrespective of the documents has
published during the decade 1994-2003 followed by those published during
1984-1993, having 1823 citations or 18.97 %. Further, for period
1964-1973, 2004-2013 and for 1974-1983, the percentage of citations were
very close i.e. 11.36 %, 10.75 % and 10.54 % respectively. The decade
from 1904-1913 has the lowest number of citations i.e. 78 or 0.81 %. It
is also observed that the number of citations dominates for the four
consecutive decade i.e. from 1964-2013.
5.5 Chronological Distribution of Books Citations
The chronological distribution of all the 4525 (remaining 52
citations were cited without year) books citations is shown in Table 6
and Figure 4. The book citations cover the time period from 1687 to
2013. It is observed that the decades 1984-1993 and 1994-2003 have the
highest (1027, contributing 22.70 % and 918 contributing 20.29 %) and
the lowest (19, contributing 0.42 %) number of citations respectively.
It is also observed that the recent four decades i.e. 1964-1973;
1974-1983; 1984-1993 and 1994-2003 have contributed more than 50 %
citations i.e. about 69.52 % of the total citations.
5.6 Chronological Distribution of Journal Citations
In case of journals, 1356 citations are found with year and 32
citations found without year. The sequential distribution of journals
citations from the time period 1904 to 2013 is illustrated in Table 7
and Figure 5. Like the chronological distribution of book, it is
observed that the recent three decades i.e. 1984-1993; 1994-2003 and
2004-2013 have contributed 1020 citations that contributes more than
75.22 % of the total citations.
zzz
Table 7:--Chronological Distribution of Journal Citations
Year Document Citation Percentage of Citations
1904-1913 2 0.15
1914-1923 12 0.88
1924-1933 19 1.40
1934-1943 5 0.37
1944-1953 9 0.66
1954-1963 56 4.13
1964-1973 74 5.46
1974-1983 127 9.37
1984-1993 340 25.07
1994-2003 435 32.08
2004-2013 245 18.07
Year not found 32 2.36
1356 100.00
5.7 Half-Life of Gandhian Literature
The overall half-life of Gandhian literature was 30 years, whereas
20 years in Journals and 29 years in books. The overall half-life of
literature indicates that the libraries on social science can consider
in their acquisition policy to acquire 30 years back literature as being
the most active life of literature. It means that the researchers should
consult the journals and books at least of the last 20 years for
journals literature and 29 years for books from the current year while
pursuing their research on social science and allied subjects as being
most active literature, covering 50 % of the current literature.
5.8 Authorship Pattern
The uniqueness of any subject literature not only depends on the
basic publishing patterns but also on author's contribution.
Therefore, authorship analysis is important for the citation analysis of
any field. Thus, in this work, the authors were analysed to determine
frequencies of single, multiple and the noteworthy or core authors
available in the subject. A clear picture of an analysis of year wise
distribution of authorship pattern is presented in Table 8. From 9612
citations, 7586 citations had author's names, while 2026 citations
were found either without authors or having corporate authorship. It is
identified from the table that single authorship has prominently been
observed, with 6860 citations (90.43 %) in the field. Two author's
contributions ranked on second position with 611 citations contributing
8.05 %, whereas three and more than three authors contributed only 1.52
%. In the year 2009, single author and two authors citations were
highest i.e. 532 (7.01 %) and 61 (0.80 %) citations respectively,
whereas three or more than three authors citation were highest in the
year 2008.
Table 8:--Year-wise Distribution of Authorship Pattern
Year Single Two More than three
No of % No of % No of %
Authors Authors Authors
1994 298 3.93 30 0.40 8 0.11
1995 381 5.02 30 0.40 1 0.01
1996 325 4.28 28 0.37 3 0.04
1997 312 4.11 21 0.28 0 0.00
1998 304 4.01 27 0.36 1 0.01
1999 349 4.60 33 0.44 7 0.09
2000 346 4.56 31 0.41 4 0.05
2001 320 4.22 26 0.34 3 0.04
2002 237 3.12 15 0.20 4 0.05
2003 227 2.99 14 0.18 3 0.04
2004 272 3.59 12 0.16 4 0.05
2005 194 2.56 14 0.18 2 0.03
2006 413 5.44 46 0.61 6 0.08
2007 226 2.98 23 0.30 3 0.04
2008 476 6.27 44 0.58 6 0.08
2009 532 7.01 61 0.80 10 0.13
2010 450 5.93 52 0.69 11 0.15
2011 464 6.12 34 0.45 13 0.17
2012 351 4.63 26 0.34 10 0.13
2013 383 5.05 44 0.58 16 0.21
6860 90.43 611 8.05 115 1.52
Year Total Multiple-
authorship
No of % No of %
Authors Authors
1994 336 4.43 38 0.50
1995 412 5.43 31 0.41
1996 356 4.69 31 0.41
1997 333 4.39 21 0.28
1998 332 4.38 28 0.37
1999 389 5.13 40 0.53
2000 381 5.02 35 0.46
2001 349 4.60 29 0.38
2002 256 3.37 19 0.25
2003 244 3.22 17 0.22
2004 288 3.80 16 0.21
2005 210 2.77 16 0.21
2006 465 6.13 52 0.69
2007 252 3.32 26 0.34
2008 526 6.93 50 0.66
2009 603 7.95 71 0.94
2010 513 6.76 63 0.83
2011 511 6.74 47 0.62
2012 387 5.10 36 0.47
2013 443 5.84 60 0.79
7586 100.00 726 9.57
5.9 Core and significant authors in Gandhian Literature
Core authors or researchers play extremely important role in the
development of any discipline. Core authors are considered as the
foundation of the particular discipline, since they play a significant
role in the development of that subject. Thus, it is indispensable to
know the core authors and their works for better understanding of any
research. For this purpose, the citation analysis is considered as one
of the suitable method to identify significant and core authors.
The first five positions were occupied by M K Gandhi, Gene Sharp,
Raghavanlyer, Bhikhu Parekh and D.G. Tendulkar. As expected, the
citations from M K Gandhi's contributions were maximum i.e. 614 of
the total citations. The second position was received by Gene Sharp with
76 citations. It is clear that there is a tremendous gap of citations,
an obviously every author prefer to read the paper written by M K
Gandhi. One more important parameter came into the picture is that
Jawaharlal Nehru holds the sixth position with 39 citations.
5.10 Core and Significant Journals in Gandhian Literature
The journals which are highly cited by the authors are known as
core journal. These journals are very useful for researchers for their
scientific communication. The study of quality, usefulness and
suitability of journals is important for a librarian. The study related
to core journal ranking is important in selection of journals and for
assessing the significant journals in a particular subject field. The
articles published in highly cited journals are always highly related
and relevant articles to a particular subject. It was observed that
there were 620journals having 1356 citations among them the Gandhi Marg
has highest citations i.e. 177 citations of the total citation. This was
followed by Economic and Political Weekly, Journal of Peace research,
Mainstream and Alternatives, having 87, 38, 18 and 16 citations
respectively.
5.11 Core and Significant Books and Composite Books in Gandhian
Literature
Like journals, books are also frequently referred by the
researchers. The repeatedly referred books are close to the subject.
These highly cited books are also known as the citation classics. In the
present field, it was found that there are 3261 books with 4525
citations. Among these, the most dominated book was Collected Works of
Mahatma Gandhi with 468 citations. The second position was occupied by
The Storyof My Experiment with Truth:An Autobiography with 71 citations.
This was followed by Hind Swaraj or Indian Home Rule, Hind Swaraj, The
Conquest of violence: The Gandhian Philosophy of Conflict and, having
44, 41 and 31citations respectively. These titles can be considered as
the core titles of the cited books.
6 Conclusion
Citation analysis of the journal "Gandhi Marg" for the
period under study reveals following findings:
1) The average number of citations about 21.31 per article shows
that reasonably good numbers of past studies have been cited by the
scholars while publishing the articles in the journal.
2) Books, journals and composite books were mostly cited by the
scholars, which were accounting for 47.08 per cent, 14.11 per cent and
12.43 per cent of the total citations respectively. On the other hand,
the publications started by Gandhi himself (Harijan, Young India and
Harijan Sevak) have been cited 9.05 per cent of the total citations.
Like other social science subjects, books, being the primary form were
cited mostly. The study also shows that there has been proliferation of
Gandhian Thoughts, however, the publications started and written by the
Gandhi are still having the importance for the scholars.
3) The cited half-life of the literature published in the journals
and books is 20 years and 29 years respectively. However, the overall
half-life of Gandhian literature is 30 years. It is a good indicator for
Gandhian Philosophy in a way that the Gandhi ji (died in 1948) had
written most his contributions before 65 years ago, which is a double of
the half-life of overall citing literature and three times of
journals' citing half-life. It shows that the Gandhian thoughts and
philosophy have been proliferating very well among the followers and
scholars as they are being cited mostly, which is very good for the
growth of the discipline.
4) Only 611 citations (8.05 %) have been authored by more than one
author i.e. multiple authors, whereas 6860 citations (90.43 %) were
authored by single author. It is evident that most of the studies have
been cited which were contributed by individuals. The authors who got
high degree of acknowledgement/citations for their thoughts were: MK
Gandhi (7.24%), Gene Sharp (0.90%), Raghavanlyer (0.72%), BhikhuParekh
(0.61%) and D G Tendulkar (0.58%). Only 7.24% citations of the
literature written by Gandhi indicates that recently the Gandhian
philosophy is not confined to only the writings by Gandhi, but due to
proliferation of the subject many new scholars (4582 number of scholars)
have emerged as per this study and they have been carried out the
Gandhian philosophy further through their quality contributions/writings
on Gandhian Philosophy.
5) M K Gandhi has received the maximum number of citations i.e. is
614. And there is a huge gap between the first and second position. As
on second position the author Gene Sharp came with 76 citations
6) The journals' citations were scattered among 620 journals.
The Gandhi Marg was ranked first with the highest citations i.e. 177,
accounting for 13.05 per cent of the total citation received by the
journals. The second position was occupied by Economical and Political
Weekly with 87 citations accounting with 6.42 per cent. The mostly cited
books were Collected Works of Mahatma Gandhi and The Story of My
Experiment with Truth: an Autobiography with 468 and 84 citations
respectively, both written by Gandhi ji. These sources can be considered
the classic in the field of Gandhian Studies.
References
Clark, Michael Levine, & Gil, Esther. A comparative analysis of
social sciences citation tools, Online Information Review, 2009, 33(5),
986-996.
Garfield, E. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation,
Science, 1978, 168, 471-479. Garfield, E. Citation indexes for science:
A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas, Science,
1955, 122(3159), 108-111.
Garfield, E. Is citation analysis a legitimate tool?
Scientrometrics, 1979, 1(4), 359-375.
Nicholas, David, & Ritche, Maureen. Literature
andbibliometrics, London: Clive Bingley. 1978 Pritchard, A. Statistical
bibliography or bibliometrics, Journal of Documentation, 1969, 25(4),
348-349.
Rana, M.S. Scientrometric study of wild mammal research in India:
authorship, distribution and research trend. Germany: Lambert Academic
Publishing. Germany, 2010
Sandison, A. Documentation note: Thinking about citation analysis,
Journal of Documentation, 1989, 45(1), 59-64.
Singh, Har. Citation analysis of Collection Building during
2005-2012, Collection Building, 2013, 32(3), 89-99.
Tsay, Ming-yueh & Shu, Zhu-yee. Journal bibliometric analysis:
a case study on the Journal of Documentation, Journal of Documentation,
2010, 67(5), 806-822.
Dr. Shiv Singh
Assistant Librarian, Central Library, Lovely Professional
University, Punjab, India, Email
[email protected]
Dr. Madan Singh Rana
University Librarian, HNB Garhwal University (a Central
University), Srinagar, Uttarakhand, India, Email- msrana
[email protected]
Caption: Figure 2:--Citing Trends of Book, Journal, and Composite
Book Citations
Caption: Figure 3:--Chronological Distribution of Citation
Caption: Figure 5:--Chronological Distribution of Journals
Citations
Table 2 Year wise Distribution of Citations
Total Number Total Number Average citation
Year of Articles of Citations per article
1994 16 418 26.13
1995 24 519 21.63
1996 18 455 25.28
1997 21 466 22.19
1998 20 416 20.80
1999 23 472 20.52
2000 24 465 19.38
2001 20 486 24.30
2002 24 319 13.29
2003 24 376 15.67
2004 20 356 17.80
2005 23 313 13.61
2006 16 576 36.00
2007 22 352 16.00
2008 29 645 22.24
2009 30 801 26.70
2010 26 620 23.85
2011 21 600 28.57
2012 22 436 19.82
2013 28 521 18.61
451 9612 21.31
Table 3:--Bibliographical Distribution of Citations
Rank Document Type Citation Cumulative
citation
1 Book 4525 4525
2 Journal 1356 5881
3 Composite Book 1195 7076
4 Publications started by Gandhi 870 7946
5 CWMG (Collected works of 468 8414
Mahatma Gandhi)
6 Newspaper 372 8786
7 Report 279 9065
8 Newsletter 134 9199
9 Website 112 9311
10 Conference Proceeding 73 9384
11 Speech 38 9422
12 Lecture 30 9452
13 Interview 28 9480
14 Thesis/Dissertation 27 9507
15 Magazine 12 9519
16 Manuscript 12 9531
17 News channel 10 9541
Other 71 9612
Rank Document Type % Cumulative
%
1 Book 47.08 47.08
2 Journal 14.11 61.18
3 Composite Book 12.43 73.62
4 Publications started by Gandhi 9.05 82.67
5 CWMG (Collected works of 4.87 87.54
Mahatma Gandhi)
6 Newspaper 3.87 91.41
7 Report 2.90 94.31
8 Newsletter 1.39 95.70
9 Website 1.17 96.87
10 Conference Proceeding 0.76 97.63
11 Speech 0.40 98.02
12 Lecture 0.31 98.34
13 Interview 0.29 98.63
14 Thesis/Dissertation 0.28 98.91
15 Magazine 0.12 99.03
16 Manuscript 0.12 99.16
17 News channel 0.10 99.26
Other 0.74 100.00
Table 4:--Year-wise comparative data of Bibliographical
Distribution of Citations
Document Type 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
Book 159 259 229 211 201 263 217 245
Journal 73 74 71 53 62 61 65 49
Composite 49 61 49 52 52 54 87 53
Book
Publications 75 56 44 56 37 31 29 75
started by
Gandhi
CWMG 28 31 15 26 24 18 21 23
Newspaper 19 17 16 12 5 24 14 18
Report 2 4 12 16 15 8 7 10
Newsletter 6 6 4 17 8 7 7 7
Website 1 6
Proceeding 4 3 9 3 1 4 2
Speech 3 2 4 2 1
Dissertation 1 3 1 3 1
Interview 1 2
Lecture 1 1 1 1
Presentation 1 2 1 1
Magazine
Manuscript 4 2 1 1 1
News channel 1
Others 1 1 0 10 3 5 1 1
Document Type 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Book 164 145 185 144 267 152 305 361
Journal 34 33 44 23 91 43 92 113
Composite 47 58 41 41 76 42 79 83
Book
Publications 33 91 35 32 44 50 71 45
started by
Gandhi
CWMG 5 26 25 12 28 9 11 56
Newspaper 23 6 12 25 15 7 16 47
Report 7 3 4 11 15 16 27 16
Newsletter 1 6 2 12 10 11 11 16
Website 3 4 3 1 8 9 12 28
Proceeding 1 1 3 3 7 6 6 11
Speech 1 4 3 1 7 1
Dissertation 1 1 3 1
Interview 1 1 3 1 14
Lecture 1 1 3 1 2
Presentation
Magazine
Manuscript 1 1 1
News channel 1 1 4
Others 1 0 1 1 3 3 5 3
Document Type 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total
Book 286 242 225 265 4525
Journal 95 120 63 97 1356
Composite 77 81 55 58 11
Book 95
Publications 23 15 17 11 87
started by 0
Gandhi
CWMG 41 7 40 22 468
Newspaper 18 50 11 17 372
Report 46 32 11 17 279
Newsletter 2 1 134
Website 5 11 2 19 112
Proceeding 6 3 73
Speech 1 3 5 38
Dissertation 7 1 3 2 28
Interview 1 3 1 28
Lecture 4 16
Presentation 1 6 2 14
Magazine 11 1 12
Manuscript 12
News channel 3 10
Others 5 16 6 4 70
Table 5:--Chronological Distribution of Citation
Year Document Citation Percentage of Citations
1687-1903 42 0.44
1904-1913 78 0.81
1914-1923 192 2.00
1924-1933 462 4.81
1934-1943 504 5.24
1944-1953 461 4.80
1954-1963 652 6.78
1964-1973 1092 11.36
1974-1983 1013 10.54
1984-1993 1823 18.97
1994-2003 1959 20.38
2004-2013 1033 10.75
Year not found 301 3.13
9612 100.00
Table 6:--Chronological Distribution of Books Citations
Year Document Citation Percentage of Citations
1687-1903 28 0.62
1904-1913 31 0.69
1914-1923 19 0.42
1924-1933 95 2.10
1934-1943 118 2.61
1944-1953 250 5.52
1954-1963 417 9.22
1964-1973 611 13.50
1974-1983 590 13.04
1984-1993 1027 22.70
1994-2003 918 20.29
2004-2013 369 8.15
Year not found 52 1.15
4525 100.00
Figure 1:--Year wise Distribution of Citations
No. of No. of Average citation
Year articles citations per article
1994 16 418 26.13
1995 24 519 21.63
1996 18 455 25.28
1997 21 466 22.19
1998 20 416 20.80
1999 23 472 20.52
2000 24 465 19.38
2001 20 486 24.30
2002 24 319 13.29
2003 24 376 15.67
2004 20 356 17.80
2005 23 313 13.61
2006 16 576 36
2007 22 352 16
2008 29 645 22.24
2009 30 801 26.70
2010 26 620 23.85
2011 21 600 28.57
2012 22 436 19.82
2013 28 521 18.61
Note: Table made from line graph.
Figure 4:--Chronological Distribution of Books Citations
Books citation % of books citation
1687-1903 28 0.62
1904-1913 31 0.69
1914-1923 19 0.42
1924-1933 95 2.10
1934-1943 118 2.61
1944-1953 250 5.52
1954-1963 417 9.22
1964-1973 611 13.50
1974-1983 590 13.04
1984-1993 1027 22.70
1994-2003 918 20.29
2004-2013 369 8.15
Note: Table made from line graph.
COPYRIGHT 2015 University of Idaho Library
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2015 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.