期刊名称:Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía
印刷版ISSN:0211-2337
电子版ISSN:1988-2564
出版年度:2017
卷号:34
期号:1
页码:203-227
DOI:10.5209/ASHF.55659
语种:Spanish
出版社:Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad Complutense
摘要:Feyerabend’s thought has been object of multiple and divergent interpretations. But among them seems to be unanimous the inscription of his work within the coordinates of a postmodernism or a radical skepticism. The epistemological anarchism constitutes a reduction ad absurdum of attempts of logical positivism and critical rationalism to defining axiomatic or methodologically the science. In this sense, it can be treated as negative and skeptical arguments concerning those notions of science. However, this hermeneutic offers a fragmented and partial view of his thought. Our purpose is to reconstruct the thought that he formulated in his last years, in order to show that it does not meet the postmodern characteristics that the critics habitually ascribe to him. And particularly, we will determine the sense in which it is legitimate to characterize his work as postmodern.